Is My Noncompete Still Enforceable in Maryland in 2026?

If you are staring at a noncompete agreement and wondering whether it can actually be used against you, you are not alone. Whether you just received a cease-and-desist letter, are weighing a job offer from a competitor, or were handed a noncompete on your way out the door after a layoff, the uncertainty you are feeling is completely understandable. These agreements are written by employer-side lawyers specifically to feel intimidating, and they often work even when they would never hold up in court.

At Lebau & Neuworth, we represent Maryland employees, not employers. We have seen what an over broad or legally questionable noncompete can do to someone's career, their income, and their family's stability, and we know how to evaluate whether the agreement you signed is actually a threat or simply a scare tactic. Maryland law has been moving in employees' favor in recent years, and the landscape has shifted enough that an agreement you signed several years ago may look very different through a legal lens today. 

What Is a Noncompete Agreement And Why It Feels Like a Threat

The Language Is Designed to Scare You, But Fear Is Not the Same as Legality

Noncompete agreements are written in broad, formal legal language that implies serious consequences. Words like "irreparable harm," "injunctive relief," and "liquidated damages" are designed to make you feel like any deviation from the agreement will result in devastating legal action. Sometimes that is a realistic concern. Often it is not. The enforceability of a noncompete in Maryland depends on a specific legal analysis, and the fact that an employer included aggressive language in a contract does not mean a court will enforce it as written.

The Difference Between a Noncompete, a Non-Solicitation Clause, and a Confidentiality Agreement

Before evaluating whether your agreement can be enforced, it helps to understand what you actually signed. These are three distinct types of restrictive covenants that are often bundled together in the same document.

A noncompete agreement restricts you from working for a competitor or starting a competing business within a defined geographic area and time period. A non-solicitation clause prevents you from recruiting former colleagues or soliciting former clients after you leave, but generally does not restrict where you can work. A confidentiality agreement protects the employer's trade secrets and proprietary information. Maryland courts treat each of these differently, and the rules governing noncompetes specifically have been changing. Understanding which restriction is actually at issue in your situation matters before taking any action.

How Maryland Law Has Changed And What That Means for Your Agreement Right Now

Maryland's Wage-Based Restrictions: Who Is Legally Exempt From Noncompetes

Maryland has significantly narrowed the circumstances under which employers can enforce noncompete agreements against lower and middle-income workers. Under Maryland Labor and Employment Code § 3-716, employees whose earnings fall below a statutory threshold cannot be bound by a noncompete agreement at all. That threshold has been updated since the statute was first passed in 2019, and the current figures should be verified against the most recent version of the statute before you assume an older agreement governs your situation.

If your compensation falls below the current threshold at the time you left or were terminated, a noncompete agreement you signed may be unenforceable regardless of what it says. This is one of the first things an employment attorney will check when reviewing your situation.

The FTC Noncompete Rule: What Happened, What It Means for Maryland Workers

In 2024, the Federal Trade Commission issued a rule that would have banned most noncompete agreements nationwide. It generated significant attention and, for many workers, genuine hope. However, federal courts challenged the rule before it could take effect, and as of 2026, its legal status remains unresolved. The FTC rule should not be relied upon as a current protection without first verifying its status, as ongoing litigation continues to affect what it does and does not accomplish for workers right now.

What the FTC rulemaking did do, regardless of its current legal status, is signal a national policy direction that has influenced how employers and courts think about noncompetes. It also spurred several states to strengthen their own employee protections. Maryland's existing statutory framework remains the most reliable basis for evaluating your agreement today.

What Maryland Courts Actually Look at When Deciding Whether to Enforce a Noncompete

Even when a noncompete is not categorically prohibited by statute, Maryland courts apply a reasonableness test before enforcing one. A valid and enforceable noncompete in Maryland must protect a legitimate business interest, be reasonable in geographic scope, be reasonable in duration, not impose an undue hardship on the employee, and not be contrary to public policy.

If any of these elements is missing or disproportionate, a court can decline to enforce the agreement entirely or modify it to be more reasonable under the blue pencil doctrine. The burden of showing the agreement is reasonable generally falls on the employer. Knowing this changes how you should read the document you signed.

Five Signs Your Noncompete Might Not Hold Up in Court

Not all noncompete agreements are created equal, and some may be overly restrictive or improperly drafted from the start. Courts carefully evaluate these agreements to ensure they balance an employer’s legitimate business interests with an employee’s right to earn a living.

The Geographic Scope Is Unreasonably Wide

A noncompete that prohibits you from working anywhere in the country, or even across a broad multi-state region, is a significant red flag for enforceability. Maryland courts look for a geographic scope that is reasonably tied to where the employer actually does business and where your work was actually performed. If the restriction extends far beyond that, it may not survive judicial scrutiny.

The Time Restriction Goes Beyond What a Court Will Accept

Most enforceable noncompetes in Maryland run for one to two years. Agreements that attempt to restrict competition for three, four, or five years are frequently challenged successfully. The longer the restriction, the more an employer needs to justify it, and many cannot.

The Agreement Wasn't Backed by Real Consideration

Under Maryland law, a noncompete must be supported by adequate legal consideration, meaning something of value given in exchange for your agreement to the restriction. If you were hired with the noncompete as part of your original offer, the job itself is typically sufficient consideration. But if you were asked to sign a noncompete mid-employment without any raise, promotion, bonus, or other tangible benefit offered in return, the agreement may lack the consideration necessary to be enforceable.

Your Role Has Changed Significantly Since You Signed

If you signed a noncompete when you were hired into one position and your responsibilities, title, or compensation changed substantially over time, the original agreement may no longer accurately reflect the legitimate business interests your employer can claim. Courts look at whether the restriction still makes sense given what your role actually became, not just what it was when you signed.

You Were Laid Off, Not Just Resigned

Being terminated involuntarily, particularly in a layoff, raises serious questions about whether enforcing a noncompete is equitable at all. While Maryland does not have a blanket rule that layoffs void noncompetes, courts do factor in the circumstances of separation. 

Being restricted from earning a living in your industry after your employer chose to eliminate your position is an argument that carries real weight. If you are in this situation, severance and separation considerations often intersect directly with your noncompete obligations in ways worth reviewing carefully with an attorney.

Industries Where Noncompetes Are Being Challenged Most Aggressively in Maryland

Noncompete agreements are facing more pushback across a variety of industries, but some have become key battlegrounds. In Maryland, lawmakers and courts are paying closer attention to how these agreements affect both workers and the public, especially in fields where access to services really matters. That means employees in certain industries may have stronger reasons to question or challenge these restrictions.

Healthcare and Medical Professionals

Maryland has enacted specific restrictions on noncompetes for certain healthcare workers, particularly physicians. The policy rationale is straightforward: patients should not lose access to providers because of an employment dispute. If you work in healthcare and have been presented with or threatened by a noncompete, the legal landscape in your industry has specific protections that may apply to you.

Technology, Cybersecurity, and IT Workers

Tech workers in the Baltimore and DC metro area are frequently asked to sign noncompetes that are far broader than any legitimate business interest can justify. Restrictions that prevent a software developer or cybersecurity professional from working in their field within a large geographic radius for two years are commonly challenged, and employers in this sector often have difficulty demonstrating the kind of protectable interest that Maryland courts require.

Sales, Marketing, and Executive Roles

Sales and marketing professionals often have access to client relationships and business development strategies that employers do legitimately want to protect. However, there is a meaningful legal difference between protecting actual client relationships through a reasonable non-solicitation clause and imposing a sweeping noncompete that prevents someone from working in their industry entirely. Executives and senior leaders facing noncompete enforcement should consult an attorney before making any career moves, and should review any employment agreements and contract negotiations carefully before signing anything new.

What Happens If Your Employer Tries to Enforce a Noncompete Against You

Cease and Desist Letters: What They Actually Mean

Receiving a cease-and-desist letter from your former employer's attorney is alarming, but it is not a court order. It is a formal demand letter, and while it should be taken seriously, it does not mean you have already lost or that enforcement is inevitable. What it does mean is that you need to speak with an employment attorney immediately. What you say, do, or sign in response to that letter can significantly affect your legal position going forward. Do not respond to a cease-and-desist on your own.

Can Your New Employer Help You Fight It?

In some situations, yes. New employers with significant resources and an interest in retaining you sometimes agree to indemnify you against noncompete litigation, meaning they cover your legal costs and any damages if the former employer sues. This is more common in competitive industries where employers actively recruit from competitors and understand the risk. It is a conversation worth having with your new employer's legal team, but do not assume they will step in without asking directly.

The "Blue Pencil" Rule: How Maryland Courts Can Rewrite an Unfair Agreement

Maryland courts have the authority to modify an overbroad noncompete rather than simply voiding it entirely. This is known as the blue pencil doctrine. A court might, for example, reduce a three-year restriction to one year, or narrow a nationwide geographic scope to the state where you actually worked. 

While this may sound like good news, it also means that even a clearly unreasonable agreement is not guaranteed to be thrown out completely. Having an attorney argue for full unenforceability is a more favorable outcome than accepting a judicially modified restriction.

What You Should Do Before You Make Your Next Career Move

Before you proceed, there are some important factors to consider regarding your noncompete agreement.

Do Not Assume Your Agreement Is Unenforceable Without a Legal Review

Maryland law has changed, the political environment around noncompetes has shifted, and many agreements signed years ago may not hold up today. But none of that means your specific agreement is automatically unenforceable. The only way to know is to have an employment attorney actually read it and apply current Maryland law to your specific facts.

Do Not Assume It Is Ironclad Either

Employers count on employees feeling too intimidated to question their noncompete. Many people walk away from job opportunities, turn down offers, or stay in positions they want to leave because they believe the noncompete gives their employer absolute power. That is frequently not true. An agreement that looks airtight may have meaningful legal vulnerabilities that are not obvious to someone without experience in this area.

Talk to an Employment Attorney Before You Sign Anything With Your New Employer

If you are in the process of accepting a new position, do not sign an employment agreement, a new noncompete, or any document related to your transition until you have had legal counsel review both your existing restrictions and your new obligations. Signing a new agreement can sometimes affect how courts interpret your prior noncompete, and the interaction between the two documents matters. Reviewing employment agreements and contract negotiations before you sign protects you from creating problems that are harder to solve later.

Lebau & Neuworth Helps Maryland Workers Fight Back Against Unfair Noncompetes

Your career is not something your former employer gets to control indefinitely. If a noncompete is standing between you and your next opportunity, or if you have received a legal threat and are not sure how seriously to take it, the right step is a confidential conversation with an attorney who is on your side.

Lebau & Neuworth represents employees, not employers. When you work with our firm, you get a team that will:

What is at stake when a noncompete is enforced against you is real: your income, your professional relationships, and your family's financial security. We take that seriously, and we fight accordingly. You can also review our FAQs for answers to common questions about non-compete agreements in Maryland. Contact us today at (410) 296-3030 to schedule your free, confidential consultation. You deserve to understand your rights before you make your next move, and we are here to help you do exactly that.

Wrongfully Fired in Maryland? Signs You May Have an Employment Law Case

Losing your job can be sudden and confusing. Many Maryland workers walk away from a termination wondering if what happened was unfair, unethical, or even illegal. If you were fired and something about it does not sit right, you may be asking an important question, “Was this wrongful termination?”

At Lebau & Neuworth our employment lawyers regularly speak with employees who feel overwhelmed after being let go. Our attorneys can help you understand what wrongful termination means in Maryland, help you recognize common warning signs, and learn what steps you can take next. Contact us today at (410) 296-3030 if you believe your termination might have been the result of unfair or illegal practices.

What Does “Wrongful Termination” Mean in Maryland?

Maryland is an at will employment state, which means employers can generally terminate employees for almost any reason, including no reason at all. However, there are important exceptions. A termination may be considered wrongful if it violates federal law, Maryland law, or an employment agreement.

Wrongful termination often occurs when an employer fires someone for an illegal reason, even if that reason is disguised as something else. These cases can be subtle, which is why many employees are unsure whether they actually have a claim.

Examples of potentially illegal termination include being fired:

Understanding how these laws apply to your situation is the first step in determining whether your termination crossed a legal line.

Common Signs You Were Wrongfully Fired

While every situation is different, certain red flags frequently appear in wrongful termination cases. If any of the following feel familiar, it may be worth speaking with an employment lawyer in Maryland.

Fired After Reporting Discrimination or Harassment

One of the most common signs of wrongful termination is retaliation. If you reported workplace discrimination or harassment and were fired soon afterward, your termination may be illegal.

Retaliation can follow complaints involving:

Even if your employer claims your firing was due to performance or restructuring, the timing and surrounding circumstances matter. Maryland and federal laws protect employees who speak up about unlawful workplace behavior.

Let Go After Taking Protected Leave

Employees in Maryland have the right to take certain types of leave without fear of losing their jobs. This includes leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act, military leave, and other legally protected absences.

Warning signs include being fired shortly after:

Employers are not allowed to punish workers for exercising these rights, even if the leave caused an inconvenience.

Termination Without Proper Cause or Documentation

While at-will employment allows for termination without cause, sudden firing without documentation can still raise concerns, especially if it contradicts past performance reviews or company policies.

Potential red flags include:

Your Rights as an Employee in Maryland

Maryland employees are protected by a combination of state and federal employment laws. These laws are designed to prevent unfair firing and ensure basic workplace rights.

Your rights may include protection from termination based on:

In addition, some workers are covered by contracts, severance agreements, or non-compete agreements that further limit when and how you can be terminated. 

What You Should Do If You Suspect Wrongful Termination

If you believe you were wrongfully fired in Maryland, taking the right steps early can make a significant difference.

Consider doing the following:

You may also want to review whether your termination affects other issues such as severance, employee benefits, or non compete agreements. Each of these can impact your legal options.

How an Employment Lawyer Can Help You

Wrongful termination cases are rarely straightforward. An experienced employment lawyer can help you understand whether what happened to you was illegal and what remedies may be available.

An employment lawyer in Maryland can help by:

Legal guidance can also help you avoid common mistakes, such as missing deadlines or unintentionally waiving your rights.

Why Towson and Baltimore Workers Choose Lebau & Neuworth

At Lebau & Neuworth, we have a long history of representing employees throughout Towson, Baltimore, and across Maryland. We understand that an unexpected termination can create significant emotional stress and financial uncertainty, particularly when a job loss feels unfair or unexplained. Our team takes the time to listen to each client’s story, answer questions, and provide clear guidance so clients feel informed and supported at every stage.

Clients choose Lebau & Neuworth because we offer:

Whether a matter involves wrongful termination, employment agreements, whistleblowing claims, or severance negotiations, we remain focused on protecting our clients’ rights and helping you move forward with confidence.

Let’s Review Your Case. It’s Free to Talk

If you are unsure whether you were wrongfully fired, you do not have to figure it out alone. Speaking with an experienced employment lawyer can provide clarity and peace of mind.

Contact us today at (410) 296-3030 to schedule a confidential consultation to discuss your unique situation and learn what options may be available to you. 

Start with the Right Legal Support Today

Being fired can leave you feeling powerless, but understanding your rights is an important first step forward. If you believe your termination may have been illegal, trusted legal support can help you move ahead with confidence.

Lebau & Neuworth is committed to helping Maryland workers protect their careers and hold employers accountable when the law is violated. If you were wrongfully fired in Maryland, now is the time to get answers and explore your legal options with a team that understands what you are going through.

Guarding Against Discrimination in Physician Compensation in Maryland

Maryland doctors are paid differently based on gender, race and ethnicity, according to the results of a recent survey commissioned by the Maryland State Medical Society.

The survey set forth the following four statistics evidencing the gender pay gap:

The gender-based pay gap changed little compared to a similar survey of 2016 Maryland physician compensation. In 2016, female Maryland physicians earned 49.6% less than male physicians.

The survey report also showed the pay disparity based on race, with Asian Americans being the highest paid:

Lebau & Neuworth attorneys have expertise in representing physicians in Maryland and elsewhere in research, academic and clinician roles. Steve Lebau negotiates contracts on behalf of Maryland physicians, provides advocacy in licensure and credentialing issues, and, when required, litigates zealously on behalf of the firm’s physician clients.

If you are a physician in need of legal representation, contact Lebau & Neuworth at (410) 296-3030 or email us at lebauneuworth.com/contact-us.

Failure to Renew Employment Contracts Can Be Wrongful Termination

Recently, in Miller-Phoenix v. Baltimore City Board Of School Commissioners, (Md. Ct. Spec. App. May 29, 2020), the Court of Special Appeals held that failing to renew an employment contract may create a wrongful termination claim under Maryland law.

In the case, Mr. Miller-Phoenix (the employee) was a public-school teacher for Baltimore City (the employer). In October 2016, the employee signed a temporary employment contract with the employer and, the next day, filed a worker’s compensation claim for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In April 2017, the employer notified the employee that his employment contract was not being renewed and he would be terminated in June 2017.

The employee filed a lawsuit against the employer for numerous alleged violations, including wrongful termination. Specifically, the employee alleged that he was terminated in retaliation for filing his workers’ compensation claim.

At the initial level, the lower court ruled in favor of the employer on all the employee’s claims. With respect to the wrongful termination claim, the lower court ruled that non-renewal of a contract could not create a wrongful termination claim.

The employee appealed to the Maryland Court of Special Appeals. The appeals court ruled in favor of the employee finding that failing to renew an employment contract in retaliation for filing a workers’ compensation claim would violate Maryland public policy.

This is an important case for contractual employees in Maryland because it reminds employers that they can potentially be held liable for failing to renew employment contracts for reasons that violate Maryland’s public policy, including because of race, sex, disability or in retaliation for filing a workers’ compensation claim.

If you think you have been wrongfully terminated, the attorneys at Lebau & Neuworth may be able to help. We are highly experienced with handling all types of employment-related cases. For more information, contact us at (410) 296-3030 or lebauneuworth.com/contact-us.

Noncompete Agreements for Low-Wage Workers Banned in Maryland as of Oct. 1

A new law in Maryland that prevents employers from entering into noncompete agreements with employees who earn $15 per hour or less or $31,000 annually went into effect on October 1, 2019. The new law was passed on May 25, 2019.

Noncompete agreements are agreements that restrict an employee’s ability to find employment with a new employer that is in a similar business as their previous employer. Under the new law, agreements that are the subject to the act are those “that restrict the ability of an employee to enter into employment with a new employer or to become self-employed in the same or similar business or trade.”

The law does not limit the restrictions to those that only limit an employee after they leave employment. Therefore, the law likely bans restrictions on moonlighting or side work as well.

After the new law went into effect, any noncompete restrictions between employers and covered employees became null and void, regardless of whether the parties entered into the agreement in Maryland or outside the state.

If your employer required you to sign a noncompete agreement that is limiting your ability to find new employment, the attorneys at Lebau & Neuworth may be able to help. For more information, contact us at (410) 296-3030 or lebauneuworth.com/contact-us.

Maryland Court Holds a Non-Compete is Unenforceable

Frequently, employers require employees to sign non-compete agreements that limit an employee’s ability to find future employment. In Maryland, such agreements are enforceable if the agreements are reasonable. However, if the scope and/or duration are unreasonable or the non-compete agreement causes an undue hardship on the employee, the agreement may be unenforceable.

The U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland’s recent decision in  Allied Fire Protection, Inc. v. Huy Thai, No. 17-551 (D. Md. 10/2/17), offers an example of an unenforceable non-compete agreement.

There, the employer filed suit to enforce a non-compete agreement that prevented the employee from “engag[ing] in any way business of a similar nature” to the employer’s business, either directly or indirectly, for five years. In response, the employee filed a motion to dismiss the employer’s lawsuit, which the court granted.

The court first determined that the scope of the non-compete was unenforceable because the language of the agreement would “restrict [the employee’s] ability to engage directly or indirectly in any type of engineering, consulting or general construction business anywhere within Maryland or for that matter, the world.” The court also noted that, in order to be enforceable, non-compete agreements must be “narrowly tailored."

Next, the court held that five years was unreasonable and unenforceable because the employer failed to provide any evidence or facts in support of such a long duration. The employer also failed to cite any case where a Maryland court upheld a non-compete agreement with a five-year duration.

Finally, the court found that the non-compete agreement caused the employee undue hardship and violated Maryland’s public interest because it prevented him from performing any similar work.

For the above reasons, the court granted the employee’s motion to dismiss and held that the non-compete agreement was not enforceable.

This case is important for employees because it serves as a reminder that not all non-compete agreements are enforceable.

If your employer is requiring that you sign a non-compete agreement or is trying to enforce an agreement that you signed, the attorneys at Lebau & Neuworth may be able to help. We are experienced in dealing with non-compete agreements and other employment related contracts such as these. For more information, contact us at (410) 296-3030 or lebauneuworth.com/contact-us.